<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear Politicians and Zealots: I am not a Conservative. Or a Liberal. Or a Libertarian, or a Socialist. I am a Realist &#8211; I Want What Works and is Fair.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.briangordon.ca/2010/02/dear-politicians-and-zealots-i-am-not-a-conservative-or-a-liberal-or-a-libertarian-or-a-socialist-i-am-a-realist-i-want-what-works-and-is-fair/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.briangordon.ca/2010/02/dear-politicians-and-zealots-i-am-not-a-conservative-or-a-liberal-or-a-libertarian-or-a-socialist-i-am-a-realist-i-want-what-works-and-is-fair/</link>
	<description>Go Local, Go Sustainable, Now</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:22:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elasticsoul</title>
		<link>http://www.briangordon.ca/2010/02/dear-politicians-and-zealots-i-am-not-a-conservative-or-a-liberal-or-a-libertarian-or-a-socialist-i-am-a-realist-i-want-what-works-and-is-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>elasticsoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briangordon.ca/?p=496#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Libertarians would also say that Libertarianism comprises &quot;a huge variety of possible systems&quot;; I even had an email from a Libertarian Socialist site asking for me to promote them. 

The reality is that state socialism with a centrally-planned economy has been shown to be a disaster in many regards. The reason I included Social Democracy was to distinguish systems with some measure of central state planning that have been shown to work; perhaps you consider social democracy one of the possible socialist systems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Libertarians would also say that Libertarianism comprises &#8220;a huge variety of possible systems&#8221;; I even had an email from a Libertarian Socialist site asking for me to promote them. </p>
<p>The reality is that state socialism with a centrally-planned economy has been shown to be a disaster in many regards. The reason I included Social Democracy was to distinguish systems with some measure of central state planning that have been shown to work; perhaps you consider social democracy one of the possible socialist systems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NonHomogenized</title>
		<link>http://www.briangordon.ca/2010/02/dear-politicians-and-zealots-i-am-not-a-conservative-or-a-liberal-or-a-libertarian-or-a-socialist-i-am-a-realist-i-want-what-works-and-is-fair/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>NonHomogenized</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.briangordon.ca/?p=496#comment-318</guid>
		<description>Look, I&#039;m a socialist (but not a communist), and, while I think you made some good points in this article generally, your treatment of socialism was at best shallow and, more realistically, downright insulting. Virtually no socialists (or communists) advocate a system like those of the various &quot;communist&quot; governments that have existed. Nor, historically, has most communist or socialist thought had much in common with those systems.

I understand that they called themselves &quot;communist&quot; or &quot;socialist&quot;, and that they are what many people (most of the US and Canada) think of when they hear either term. But North Korea calls itself the Democratic People&#039;s Republic of Korea - do you believe that what they have is democracy or a republic?  There are plenty of instances of countries calling themselves something they clearly are not in order to associate themselves with a term that is thought well of. You should actually read what socialists (which is a collection of a huge variety of possible systems, both with or without states) say socialism is - not what propaganda says it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I&#8217;m a socialist (but not a communist), and, while I think you made some good points in this article generally, your treatment of socialism was at best shallow and, more realistically, downright insulting. Virtually no socialists (or communists) advocate a system like those of the various &#8220;communist&#8221; governments that have existed. Nor, historically, has most communist or socialist thought had much in common with those systems.</p>
<p>I understand that they called themselves &#8220;communist&#8221; or &#8220;socialist&#8221;, and that they are what many people (most of the US and Canada) think of when they hear either term. But North Korea calls itself the Democratic People&#8217;s Republic of Korea &#8211; do you believe that what they have is democracy or a republic?  There are plenty of instances of countries calling themselves something they clearly are not in order to associate themselves with a term that is thought well of. You should actually read what socialists (which is a collection of a huge variety of possible systems, both with or without states) say socialism is &#8211; not what propaganda says it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

